Asteróides-Pipas Transportaram a Água Para o Planeta Terra?! Porque não Trouxeram Vinho e Cachaça Tambem?

É cada uma! Um considerado sério jornal como o The Wall Street Journal publicou este artigo e a minha opinião de que as escolas e universidades estão deixando os alunos totalmente aloprados formando estes cientistas aloprados não poderia me evitar postar a minha opinião seguinte no jornal:

Veja link:

Rosetta Data Support View That Asteroids Brought Water to Earth

Direct measurements of the water contained on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko by the Rosetta spacecraft support the view that it was asteroids that brought most of the water to the early Earth. The findings undermine a view that  favored comets as the source of Earth’s water. Gautam Naik reports.

Louis Morelli
Louis Morelli – Dec, 11, 2014

Schools are teaching a wrong model for astronomic systems formation and this is serious because the believe in any world view is the foundations for a moral code, some humans behaviors and prejudices the mind’s evolution. A “theoretical” model is being told to be scientifically proved, as you can see inn the shollars texts.

This model suggests that Earth and any other planet next to the Sun could not have this big quantity of water, so, what are they waiting for telling the thru and searching another more accurate model?

Like Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a different model that predicts this water and every day is reinforced by space new data. We are doing a disservice to our children selling theories as if they were already proved by data. All prior civilizations broke down due were built upon wrong interpretations of this natural world and we are repeating the bad course, our future generations and maybe we that are alive today will pay the hard price.


The theoretical current model for astronomic systems formations is wrong but the academic staff does not want to recognize it. Then, non-rational hypothesis like this one are necessary for fitting into the model. We are watching everyday new real data and the experts words: “this was not predicted by the model, or “this is exception because does not fit the known formation process”, etc.

Comets are not formed by the Kuiper Belt and are not made up of ice, dust and rocky material, only. Comets originates from giant volcanoes of giant gaseous old planets and their nucleus are composed by volcanic magma. Planets are not formed by isolated and separated dust at peripheral nebular regions, but by the same central vortex that formed the star, so, planets were covered by ice at their formation and the stars heat evaporated or transformed into water this surface ice… as predicted by a more rational astronomic model called “Matrix/DNA Theory”. Both are theoretical models very different, but also the academic staff does not want to recognize any others model.

Tags: , , , ,