Debate entre Religiosos, Ateus, e Matrix/DNA: Sobre Origens e Evolução

xxxx

https://plus.google.com/u/0/

ElevateD

Shared publicly  –  Yesterday 1:31 AM

 
 
#800
The Myth of Evolution
Evolution is not scientific and that, evolution is a religion and it was created to mislead people and lower the moral standard in our society. Evolution has too many errors to be logical and mutation cannot create life! What type of demoralizing speech is this to say that the transferring of information in different species were transferred by mutation?Since Darwinists are unable to account for how a protein might have formed spontaneously, they claim that the beginning of life was “a first molecule capable of self-reproducing.” First of all, there is no such thing as a “self-reproducing molecule.” If this molecule was a protein, the smallest units inside the living cell, then it must be borne in mind that proteins themselves have no “self-reproductive” property.

In order for a protein to be able to self-replicate, It needs:
Other proteins
DNA
Ribosomes
Endoplasmic reticulum
Cytoplasm
Energy manufacturing mitochondria
And the cell membrane.
In short, A FULLY EQUIPPED CELL.

Therefore, the idea of a “self-reproducing molecule” is totally fraudulent. It is impossible for a molecule not inside a living cell to be able to take in energy from the outside and use it to replicate itself. To refer to this as “an organization progressing toward life” is demagoguery and a deliberate distraction. “Organization progressing toward life” is a totally illogical term. The smallest living thing is “a CELL.” Only a cell and the structures inside it can self-reproduce. Only a cell can take in energy from the outside and use it. Only a cell can maintain its own existence through its own organelles and the energy it takes in from the outside.

To put it another way, there can be no supposed stages progressing from the inanimate toward life. Life can never come from something inanimate. That’s absolutely impossible. All research at the molecular level has proved in the 20th Century that life cannot come from what is inanimate; and this has been confirmed by science in the 21st Century. Not even the presence of a protein is enough for a living thing to form. In order to be able to explain life, Darwinists have to account for the formation of a single cell. But they are still unable to account for how a single protein might have emerged spontaneously. A tiny protein inside the cell totally demolishes Darwinism.

Also, the fossil record indicates that living things did not evolve from primitive to advanced forms, but instead emerged all of a sudden and in a perfect state. In short, living beings did not come into existence by evolution, they were created.

Even Darwin himself was aware of the absence of such transitional forms. It was his hope that they would be found in the future. Despite his hopefulness, he realized that the biggest stumbling-block in his theory was the missing transitional forms. Therefore in his book The Origin of Species he wrote the following in the chapter “Difficulties of the Theory”:

“ …Why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?… But, as by this theory innumerable transitional form must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust to the earth?… But in the intermediate region, having intermediate conditions of life, why do we not now find closely-linking intermediate varieties? This difficulty for a long time quite confounded me.”

http://harunyahya.com/en/Articles/2013/the-fossil-record-refutes-evolution
http://harunyahya.com/en/pages/id/1858/Fossils-Refute-Evolution

This has proven to be a blatant lie! How can you people believe such a lie? What is really happening to the eyes of you people?

xxxx
Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory
First you said: “” Evolution is not scientific and that, evolution is a religion…”
You are right and wrong. Evolution is a relativistic issue. It is dependable of the observer at his point in time/space. So, a microscopic observer situated inside an ovule being fecundated and watching the whole process of embryogenesis, he will see the transformations and arisen of complexity as evolution. But we, outside the ovule, knows that is merely “reproduction”. Then, human beings are microscopic observer inside this Universe. It is normal that what we are watching here seems to be evolution. But, Matrix/DNA Theory has its version of Universal Natural History which suggests that inside this Universe is occurring a merely process of genetic reproduction of the unknown thing that was/is existing beyond this “cosmic egg”. And, as says the Godel’s theorem: “Nobody can knows the thru about a system standing inside it” While we does not go outside this Universe for seeing from the outside perspective, we never will know it is is evolution or reproduction…
Then, evolution is scientific like the evolutionary process of embryogenesis is, and is not religion because there is no magics in embryogenesis. But you are right: we can not be affirmative saying that we are watching evolution inside this Universe.
xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory:
Second, You said: “Evolution has too many errors to be logical…”
Yes, there are errors, because: 1) Evolution is a positive force flowing in the middle a matter’s environment that also contains its counterpart, the negative force. So, the first and supreme goal of this matter is to reach the  eternal inertia as closed system under thermodynamic equilibrium. It happened when universal evolution arrived to the shape of astronomical systems, notary, the galactic systems. It is the most perfect possible machine, but, closed to evolution. Then, the positive force attacked these systems with entropy, fragmenting them into its smallest bits-information (photons), spreading these bits in time and space inside the own galactic body, and the final result is that these bits lifted up as biological systems, which are opened systems to  evolution. 2) There is a small degree of free-will for this universal system under evolution and it is the cause of a lots of evolutionary errors; 3) Every new shape of this universal system obeys two stages: first, the environment is under chaos and the eggs are put out, subject to negatives forces, making lots of errors; second, there  is the hierarchy of systems, which determined that any new system is not really put out, they was always inside another big system which is the ordered state. Since that the biggest system is promoting a reproductive process, at the final all shapes of systems will be the perfect final system as the son of the unknown thing that triggered the Big Bang.
xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory:
You said: “What type of demoralizing speech is this to say that the transferring of information in different species were transferred by mutation?”
It seems mutations to you that is an observer located inside the space and time occurring a universal process. And it seems mutations by randomness to some people. Both are right and wrong. A hypothetical observer inside a fecundated ovule will see continuous transformations, but since that he does not know DNA and genetics, he will believe that is watching mutations, and caused by chance. We are observers inside this egg-universe and you does not know the Universal Matrix driving like the DNA a cosmological process of reproduction. Since there is the negative forces and some free-will, actually there are mutations by chance or caused by negative forces against universal evolution. Some of these mutations by chance are beneficial to the process, so, they are kept; those that are against the big purpose of evolution are discarded.
xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory: ( fourth)
You said: ” Since Darwinists are unable to account for how a protein might have formed spontaneously…”
Darwin had no knowledge that he was watching a micro-cycle of cosmological evolution, which is related to this biological evolution. So, he couldn’t calculated the anatomy of LUCA – the last Universal Common Ancestor of all biological system. LUCA is an astronomical system to which Earth belongs to. Look its face at my avatar here, the internal circuity of vital cycle of astronomical elements. The “goal” of LUCA is to reproduce itself in shape of biological system here, an embryogenic process measured in astronomical scale of time, that’s why biologicals are evolving by 3,5 billion years.
Proteins are the biological representatives of the spherical systemic circuit, which is shared into particles/waves, being the particles as astronomical bodies in the sky or cellular organelles in a cell, or yet, the several different shapes that yours body gets in yours lifetime. So, the first proteins were not formed by their own or by casual combinations of atoms into molecules. There was an invisible variable coming with sun’s light, radiations from Earth’s nucleus, and cosmic radiation, invading terrestrial atoms and driving them to build the proteins.
xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory: (fifth)
You said: ” they claim that the beginning of life was “a first molecule capable of self-reproducing.”

The ancestor and creator of “life” at Earth was this astronomical system we are inside it. And it already was “self-reproducing”. It is enough for understanding it seeing the anatomy of this LUCA at my website. But… since that LUCA is our primitive ancestor, every mechanism and life’s properties  must be evolutionarily reduced to its 10 billion years ago. So, in LUCA the process of self-reproducing was merely a process of self-recycling, which needs that a system dies totally and from its dust, lift up again in the same shape it was before. The interstellar dust contained the information for this self-rebuilding. When evolution arrived to biological systems – which are not closed system like LUCA – the self-recycling process was not possible, but the forces doing it developed the process merely by launching a lateral branch of the systemic circuit towards its nucleus… and then… was born what you call “self-reproduction”.

xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory: (sixth)
You said: “proteins themselves have no “self-reproductive” property. In order for a protein to be able to self-replicate, It needs:
Other proteins
DNA
Ribosomes, etc…”

The first primordial molecules or proteins were not in needs of self-replicating. They were formed obeying the natural rules of a reproductive process, the reproduction of the astronomical ancestor “LUCA”. And there is a difference between LUCA reproduction and humans reproduction. While humans transmits its genetic information closed inside an internal membrane called spermatozoid and ovule (which makes only one possible copy), LUCA transmitted its genetic information with its bits spreaded into time and space, inside the whole galaxy. Arriving to a common environment, those bits do what immigrants do in New York, each race joining themselves and creating its own village. So, the first packets of information were differentiated and it created the enormous diversity of proteins here, and later, the diversity of life’s shapes. Those smallest packets later joined to form bigger ones but always in the same circuit’s sequence performed at LUCA. So, equals and different proteins arose here and there, at everyplace at Earth’s surface, without needing a complete cell.

xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory: ( last)

I will stop here but I can refute and explain any assertion that you can make against Darwinism, not from Darwinism but from the Matrix/DNA world view. The Matrix wrote a new version of Universal Natural History without founding any trace of supernatural beings doing any magics here. Yours and the evolutionists problem is that both forgot our supreme mother nature for asking answers to supreme existential questions. You, both, need going back to watching Nature, because nature does not plays dice with its creatures: the method that nature creates universes, biological lifes and human bodies is always the same, so, watch the creation of yours son for getting those answers. This Universe is merely an agglomerated of old ancestors called “galaxies” in which bodies we arose and are living now. In this universe is occurring a genetic process of reproduction from the unknown natural system that was/is existent beyond it. If you want call it/him/her as God, or if the atheists want call it as “the Absolute Nothing” I have no problem with it, but. please, take out these things called “magics”, “supernaturals”, because they does not exists inside this Universe and you, neither the opposite theorists can prove it. But… the models of Matrix/DNA can because they are scientifically falsifiable.