Posts Tagged ‘Darwinism’

Quando o DNA vai contra a Natureza e mata o Corpo Inteiro: O Segrêdo oculto nas Mãos e nos Chifres dos Mamiferos

sábado, fevereiro 15th, 2014

What killed the woolly mamoto? New clues.

http://earthsky.org/earth/what-killed-the-woolly-mammoth-new-clues

Most images of Woolly Mammoth depict them in grasslands, such as this illustration. New evidence indicates that Ice Age flora was mostly herbaceous flowering plants. Image credit: Mauricio Antón via Wikimedia Commons.

Most images of Woolly Mammoth depict them in grasslands, such as this illustration. New evidence indicates that Ice Age flora was mostly herbaceous flowering plants. Image credit: Mauricio Antón via Wikimedia Commons.

Observe as prêsas esquisitas dos mamutes. Para que, porque o corpo desenvolveu esse apêndice mal-formado sem utilidade alguma e, ao contrario, um traste incomodo a ser carregado, uma arma a favor dos predadores pois dificulta a auto-defesa do mamute…?!  Presas de marfim encurvadas, que podiam atingir cinco metros de comprimento! A fórmula da Matrix/DNA sugere uma explicação do porque esse traste se desenvolveu assim e porque ele contribuiu decisivamente para a eterna extinção dos mamutes. Para entender, primeiro observe a fórmula:

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

Agora coloque sua mão esquerda sobre a fórmula de maneira que a palma fique encima do vortex na F1, o dedo mindinho fique em cima da F2… até o polegar ficar em cima de F7 ( se precisar, clique na formula para amplia-la). Porque a fórmula é à imagem e semelhança da sua mão?! Porque essa é a fórmula que a natureza tem usado desde o Big Bang para organizar a matéria inerte em sistemas naturais funcionais. Todos os sistemas naturais cabem como a sua mão, encima dela, porque ela está dentro da estrutura de todos os sistemas naturais. Então sempre que um sistema natural – como o corpo de um animal – tem a necessidade de desenvolver um apêndice, ou mudar seu corpo, para sobreviver melhor, um comando chega ao DNA, (o qual é uma pilha cujos building blocks, os nucleotídeos, são pura e simplesmente esta mesma fórmula) para mais uma vez produzir uma cópia da fórmula a qual sera adicionada ao corpo como apêndice ou acessório, e será deformada, mutada, de acordo com a função que dela se exige. Se o corpo precisa de um apêndice para segurar objetos, modelar objetos, penetrar cavidades, etc., o que era casco de mamífero vai sendo modelado, transformado, a té chegar a forma da mão humana, e não se sabe se vai parar aí.

Agora você tem novo assunto interessante em que pensar. Você passou sua vida tôda olhando suas mãos, mexendo seus dedos, e nunca havia percebido que as formas e as funções da palma e dos dedos obedecem exatamente as formas e funções de qualquer corpo sob um ciclo vital! O mindinho é o baby, desajeitado, o dedo médio é o jovem adulto, a forma mais forte, imponente, o indicador é o adulto formado, indicando sempre as ordens à família e ao sistema social, o polegar, coitado, mais desajeitado ainda e quase inerte, é o adulto se tornando cadáver… e a palma é o útero, o centro gerador de babies e dedos… Bem vindo, finalmente, ao conhecimento de suas mãos!

Então, em certa época no passado, a evolução dos animais acionou o DNA para produzir um apêndice para auto-defesa contra predadores e/ou melhorar a captura de alimentos, que eram os unicórnios, depois os chifres, geralmente surgidos no alto da testa, e, por alguma razão, em outros animais, a pressão imposta ao crescimento dos chifres mudou para pressão imposta ao crescimento de dentes afiados de carnívoros, surgindo na boca e  frente baixa da face como nos elegantes, rinocerontes, etc., o que se chama de “prêsas”.

Mas estes animais floresceram numa época de grande fartura de alimentos, e acomodados apenas em comer e dormir foram crescendo e tornando-se obesos. P mamute do rio Songhua, podia alcançar de 4.70 até 5,00 metros de altura e pesar entre 15 e 20 toneladas. No mamute a fórmula da Matrix/DNA continuou a desenvolver-se sem contrôle nas prêsas,  porque o animal não fazia nenhum esforço físico que enviasse um comando nervoso ao DNA para avisá-lo que aquilo já estava ameaçando sua existência. Observe como prêsas do mamute foi adquirindo a forma da fórmula, (lembre-se que no diagrama acima a fórmula está desenhada em duas dimensões, mas na verdade ela é uma espiral), chegando quase a encontrarem-se as duas pontas, fechando-se finalmente como circuito esférico.

Ora, o planeta muda, mudando climas e condições de existência, e os seres vivos devem serem flexíveis o suficiente para acompanharem estas mudanças, ou serão extintos. Muitos animais se tornaram rígidos, imutáveis, tentando manterem à fôrça os privilégios adquiridos num estado de clima, acomodando-se assim e tornando-se um sistema fechado em si mesmo, fechando suas portas à evolução. Ao invés de evoluírem qualitativamente, apenas cresceram em tamanho, obesidade e assim se tornaram um ramo lateral da arvore da vida evolutiva, um ramo condenado a se secar e se extinguir. A própria Humanidade, se continuar assim seguindo e se atolando cada vez mais no caminho do mecanicismo, está se tornando uma espécie acomodada, um sistema fechado, e se não acordar e mudar-se, não terá destino diferente do que levou os ancestrais à extinção. Por isso luto e apelo a todos que aprendam e compartilhem da cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA, pois ela é a unica possibilidade que estou vendo que poderá nos levar a desejar e obter esta mudança salvadora.

Então aconteceu o que os cientistas do artigo com link acima descobriram agora. As mudanças climáticas derrubaram a vegetação alta onde se alimentavam os grandes animais terrestres, a girafa teve que abaixar o pescoço, o mamute começou a arrastar seu penduricalho no solo para obter as plantas baixas. Mas as plantas continuaram diminuindo de tamanho ao ponto de a paisagem ser dominada pelas gramíneas… E como a boca do mamute iria alcançar a grama, se seus chifres o impedia? Cada vez mais passando fome, num lento processo que deve ter sido uma tortura, não tiveram outro destino senão sua extinção para sempre. Sei que mamutes também tinham pequenas trompas, menores que as dos elefantes, mas imagine a dificuldade em arrancar gramas com trompas! No final de sua existência, as trompas estavam desenvolvendo duas extensões separadas na ponta delas, que estavam se assemelhando a dois dedos. Isto sugere que a formula da Matrix que desenvolveu os dedos nas mãos de outros mamíferos foi ali também acionada, mas tarde demais. Esta teoria é fato evidente ocorrido com elefantes, como se pode ver na observação da Wikipedia abaixo.  Outra evidencia para a dificuldade do alimento e diminuição dele está no caso do mamute anão, também conhecido como Mamute da Ilha Wrangel na Rússia e Mamute da Ilha São Paulo no Alaska,  (Mammuthus primigenius vrangeliensis) , o qual não é uma espécie, é na verdade uma subespécie do mamute-lanoso que sofreu nanismo insular. Nessas ilhas esses Mamutes pequenos viveram bem mais do que a versão normal, do continente, que foi extinta há 10.000 anos. A variedade do Alaska viveu até 3750 anos atrás, enquanto que os da Ilha Wrangel, estima-se terem vivido a até 1700 anos atrás.

Resume-se o artigo cientifico, na seguinte frase: “Scientists suggest that the less nutritious grasses could not sustain the large mammals, resulting in their extinction about 10,000 years ago. These findings, by an international team of scientists, were published on February 05, 2014, in the journal Nature.” Ok, os cientistas focalizam  a causa externa, vinda do meio-ambiente, como unica causa da extinção – a mudança climática transformando plantas maiores e mais nutritivas em grama, menor e menos nutritiva. Sou o único a sempre pensar que a causa da extinção é sempre dividida em metade da culpa a fatores externos e metade da culpa a fatores internos da própria criatura, porque a fórmula da Matrix/DNA sugere assim. Parece irônico que os cientistas olhem para a foto dos mamutes e se esqueçam de ver as prêsas desviando o olhar imediatamente para a pequena grama embaixo. Como deixar de notar e raciocinar sobre aquelas prêsas?!

Bem, essas as sugestões da cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA. Me parece que não teria sido apenas os chifres a causa decisiva da extinção, outros fatores devem ter colaborado (Descobertas mostram também que o ser humano teve papel fundamental sobre a extinção dos Mamutes. A descoberta mostra que o ser humano da Idade da Pedra caçava mamutes para comida, vestimentas, ossos e couro para fabricação de casas), mas tambem me parece óbvio que estes trastes inúteis de chifre prejudicaram tanto a alimentação como se sentiriam prejudicados humanos nativos com dentes podres e muitas falhas tendo apenas duras raízes com que se alimentar. Obviamente o texto cientifico acima em nada vai mencionar minhas sugestões, pois os cientistas desconhecem completamente esta teoria, e como sempre aviso que ela pode conter muitos erros  (apesar das milhares de evidencias que tenho encontrado nestes 30 anos, como por exemplo a interessante semelhança entre as mãos e a fórmula), também volto a insistir que leiam as explicações dos cientistas e as considere.

Esqueleto de um Mamute-columbiano.

Esqueleto de um Mamute-columbiano.

Informação adicional como evidencia da minha sugestão acima: 

1) Wikipedia (elefante)

Ao contrário da maior parte dos mamíferos, que desenvolvem dentes de leite e depois os substituem pelos dentes adultos permanentes, os elefantes têm ciclos de rotação de dentes durante a vida toda. Passado um ano as presas são permanentes, mas os molares são substituídos seis vezes durante a vida média de um elefante.3 Os dentes não irrompem dos maxilares verticalmente como os dentes humanos. Em vez disso, eles têm uma progressão horizontal, como um tapete rolante. Os novos dentes crescem na parte de trás da boca, empurrando dentes mais velhos para a frente, onde eles se gastam com o uso e os restos caem. Quando um elefante se torna velho, os últimos dentes ficam gastos, e o elefante tem de comer apenas comida muito macia. Elefantes muito velhos frequentemente passam os últimos anos exclusivamente em zonas pantanosas onde conseguem encontrar folhas de relva molhada e macia. Por fim, quando os últimos dentes caem, os elefantes não conseguem comer e morrem de fome. Se não fosse pelo desgaste dos dentes, o metabolismo dos elefantes permitir-lhes-ia viver muito mais tempo. Como cada vez mais habitat é destruído, o território dos elefantes torna-se cada vez mais pequeno; os mais velhos já não têm a oportunidade de procurar comida mais apropriada e, por isso, morrem de fome mais novos.

2) prêsas em Inglês: long, curved tusks

xxxxx

Comentários postados no artigo:

Avatar
TheMatrixDNA  16, Fev., 2014

The interpretation of mammoth extinction by Matrix/DNA Theory suggests an additional cause: the long, curved tusks. The factor pointed out by Professor Dale is a force outside>in, but, every case of extinction is half due a factor inside>out too.

These animals made the big mistakes of speciation leaving to become inertial closed systems, triggering the expression of a genetic function which produced the grown of those tusks without control. If you look to the Matrix/DNA formula you will understand it. Those tusks became a very prejudice for getting smaller plants like grasses for eating. If you want to know how and which genetic function worked here go to …

Avatar
El Tee Steve Andrews • 4 hours ago

Correlation is Not causation.. The Earth is a Biosphere.. a LIVING Entity composed of many Parts.. but the Whole Earth is Greater than the sum of the parts.. ‘IT’ adapts to re-establish Equilibrium.. recycles to Balance .. the Four Seasons .. One complete Circle … LIFE is a symbiotic relationship … all parts are equally important .. and Essential .. All Life a re-occurring Circle ..a Circle within a Circle surrounded by a CIRCLE .. Humankind’s existence is inconsequential and Meaningless except to other human beings.. The Whole Earth is but a Pearl in the Oyster of the solar system .. The Sun & the Moon & All the other Planets could care less … what we think ! They determine what Life is like on

Resposta da Matrix/DNA:

Avatar
TheMatrixDNA  El Tee Steve Andrews

You wrote everything pretty right till “circle surrounded by a circle”, but then, you falls away off the beam. While this biosphere was obeying only the rules of its creator – the planet as part of the Milk Way – and it reached the top of its limits in the shape of monkeys, you described everything well. But the creator has no consciousness, which means that something above the Milk Way is also sending informations, something that has consciousness. Human kind is not desirable by the planet and Milk Way, it is a kind of malignos virus, but it is desirable for something biggest than the Milk Way. So…correlation can be causation.

Professor de Biologia Escreve uma Carta para Darwin nos seus 200 Anos

quinta-feira, fevereiro 13th, 2014

It’s Darwin’s 205th Birthday, and People Still Don’t Accept Evolution

A letter to the man behind the theory

BY JERRY A. COYNE

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116580/charles-darwins-birthday-evolution-debate-still-going

( reler e anotar as novas boas informações neste artigo) 
Quando cheguei em New York vindo da selva era parecido com o ultimo a esquerda, evoluí, ja sou o terceiro, mas quero morrer aqui, chega de evolução!
Meus comentarios postados na seção de comentarios do artigo: 
LouisCharlesMorelli

 Great job, Sir Coyne. But there is a detail about Darwin that people usually forgets: four years being tortured in the hells of tropical primitive lands at his better ages! This is the sacrifice that nobody want to do, nobody imagines how it is painful. I have survived by seven years also alone in Amazon jungle, studying natural systems, trying to understanding the functionality and origins of that whole biosphere. While Darwin applying a kind of reductionist method had the  brilliant idea of Evolution in the jungle, I was applying the systemic method and a have a weird but logical idea: Cosmological Evolution. Then my theoretical models are united in “The Universal Matrix for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles Theory Website”, which sounds such weird as the Darwin’s idea sounded at his time.

 About Evolution my  theory is suggesting that Darwin have described only a small piece of the whole process. While Darwinian theory is based upon three variables ( VSI – Variation, Selection, Inheritance), my models are suggesting there are more four variables, totalizing seven, acting over biological evolution. My problem now is getting back all data I have obtained in the jungle for explaining my conclusions, and like darwin said, I think I will never bring it because everyday I am discovering new evidences that opens new researches… it is a job that we can not finish in a life time. The other big problem is: who or what can say that my idea is right or wrong? Darwin was a lucky guy, the a posteriori discovered data proved he was right, while my idea can be proved as wrong. If so, I think that my life was not lost in vain, it is the hard pathway of trial and error: if it is an error will save others doing it again. Is it right?

xxxxx

LouisCharlesMorelli – 16, feb, 2014
The recent discovery of the dual coding in the genome has been used by creationists here in this debate as proof for intelligent design. It is not, it was predicted by Matrix/DNA Theory as the mechanism that has worked as feed-back between the hardware and software composing all natural systems. As we can see at the Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems, from any new system emerges its own identity, which is composed by the sum of all informations of all parts plus the informations that arises from the connections among these parts. Since that Matrix/DNA shows that the DNA is not a code, but, it is merely a pile of diversified copies of a unique initial system ( the lateral pair of nucleotides), the identity of this system encrypted into the DNA is the responsible for genes control.

Then there is the second function of the genomes, which is the production of proteins. It is not the production of the whole, the identity of the system, but production of each part of that system, plus the fuzzy logics that emerges from the connection among them.

But, creationists, don’t worry that every evidence for yours beliefs are being debunked. Evolutionists will need also change their theory because the actual is lots more complex than they think. The matrix/DNA is suggesting that this Universe is a kind of womb/egg, or composed by placenta as fossils of ancient non-living ancestors like galaxies, where is occurring a internal process of genetic reproduction of the unknown natural non-magical but conscious systems that generated it. Creationists will need to give to their God the magnitude and greatness that it deserves, and avoiding this infant tendency like babies that think every tool is for playing and have ghosts talking friends.

xxxx

LouisCharlesMorelli  – Feb, 16,  2014

 That’s a great opportunity for learning something astonishing: 

james george, in a post below, said:

‘… a 415 million year old fish gave modern humans their face? this is the mindless conjecture that is being put forth by modern scientists today…”

JAMES HAS A BIG PROBLEM: HE DOES NOT KNOW THAT WAS NOT THE OLD FISH THAT GAVE MODERN FACES TO HUMAN, AND SO, WHO GAVE OUR MODERN FACE WAS AN ASTRONOMICAL SYSTEM – THE BUILDING BLOCK OF THIS GALAXY – LIVING IN THE SKY, WHICH HAVE THE SAME HUMAN FACE AT BILLION YEARS AGO BEFORE LIFE’S ORIGINS.

This face was found when comparative anatomy between living and non-living system projected a calculated simulation for a suspect link between cosmological and biological evolution. The results is model of the ancestor of the first cell system that droves evolution at abiogenesis here, and still is driven it today ( then, the old fish was merely a necessary step in the reproduction of the celestial face). Everything is clearly at that astronomical model: the mouth, two ears, nose, two eyes ( included the fact that the astronomical ancestor is nyope of the left eye, as most of human beings). See the face of LUCA at “The Universal Matrix for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”.

xxxxxx

Viva-La-Evolution

Viva-La-Evolution

james george 

since the author here believes in evolution, it’s entirely appropriate that he wrote a letter to a dead man. the theory of evolution definitely dumbs people down and the writer of this article is just more proof of that. the theory of evolution is pure fantasy and requires much more faith to believe than the belief in intelligent design does.

Resposta da Matrix/DNA:

LouisCharlesMorelli – Feb, 16, 2014

@james george If you want believe that some god applying magics created everything here i can’t say nothing, but when you are like blind man not seeing natural, real facts, I can’t stands in silence. You see everyday evolution of yours own body ( changing shapes from blastula, embryo, adult, from the simplest to complex, etc.). Why not seeing the whole process as an outsider observer and understanding that evolution is merely the sum of steps inside a larger process, called reproduction? Then you will meet yours God, because you will be an observer outside the Universe seeing that here is being reproduced the son of who created the Universe.

Same thing is “intelligent designer”. You can see that mother giraffe can produce a job of extraordinary enginery without applying intelligence when she produces a baby giraffe. Why not the Universe is the stage as a womb, where is occurring a process of genetic reproduction, without the needs for applying magics and intelligence at every evolutionary step of the universal baby? I am not saying that yours God is a giraffe, but if a humble giraffe can do it, why not yours God? The meaning issue used by the intelligent design advocates – irreducible complexity – was debunked by matrix/DNA models when showing that all biological properties are reducible to LUCA, but LUCA is in the sky, with the name “Milk Way”. Go to Matrix/DNA website see the face of LUCA and come back understanding that there is no intelligent designer without loosing the believe on yours God.

xxxxx

Excelente post a seguir, que está mostrando a mais recente estratégia dos evolucionistas: mostrar que a crença na evolução é util e certa porque ela previu itens que foram depois confirmados. Esta estratégia foi muito usada por Bill Nye no debate com o Ham, sempre perguntando “o que o criaciosnismo pode fazer the util previsão?”

EdwardMacGuire 

@james george @1toughlady  Actually it’s not a belief in evolution as much it is the realization that the evolutionary model works. Example: based on evolution scientist decides that the transition of vertebrates from water to land should have occurred about 300 mya; scientist finds rocks in the arctic dated 300 mya and, in that strata, finds a transitional fossil with  fishlike body, lobed fins with bones, a movable neck and the flattened head of an amphibian. Example: based on evolution a scientist 40 years ago writes a paper stating that when it becomes possible to compare the human and chimpanzee genome one human chromosome will be found to contain all the genes present in 2 chimpanzee chromosomes ; 10 years ago this was discovered to be true.  Evolution is accepted because it is falsifiable and  predictions can be made based upon it. Simple, really.

evolution (2)

 

 

 

 

Evolution x Creation Debate

quinta-feira, fevereiro 13th, 2014

The Science Can Be Seen as Purposeful

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/08/15/should-creationism-be-controversial/the-science-can-be-seen-as-purposeful

Karl W. Giberson, a physicist who teaches science and religion at Stonehill College, is the author of “Seven Glorious Days: A Scientist Retells the Genesis Creation Story.”

Meu comentario postado no artigo:

Louis Charles Morelli

New York, NY (

“We are hard-wired to want creationism to be true.”

There is a third world vision that you does not know yet, I will tell you their interpretation. Nope. Human brain today is result of mixing three kinds of neuronal informations and connections: 1) from this new emerging system called “consciousness”; 2) from the genetic directly inheritance of animals/mammalian; 3) remotely, from the system that created this biosphere and is modelling it – the Milk Way. That’s the explanation there are three kind of people that want three different world views to be true. And… the astonishing fact observed today is that the remote ancestral is becoming the dominant one.

xxxx

ODDOWL  WASH. GA. 4 December 2013

Evolution begin about 13 billion years ago… The Zionist Torah was written in the 6th. century A.D. in Babylon… The Torah was plagiarized from inscriptions written on the walls of the monuments in Babylon also from papyrus documents and monument inscriptions in Canaan and Egypt… The argument is not really between evolution and creationism but rather between evolution and fraudulent claims…

Louis Charles Morelli  New York, NY

Good point. When we know that evolution began 13,7 billion years ago, and re-calculates the Universal Natural History, we learn that Darwinian theory is merely the account of a micro-cycle of cosmological evolution, the one related to biological systems. The three fundamental variables of Darwinian theory (VSI – Variation, Selection, Inheritance) dos not explain even biological evolution because there are more 4 variables acting here. But the most surprising suggestion from this new Universal History is that suddenly we discover how and from where came the inspiration for those Bible’s authors. The narrative of Adam/Eve in the Paradise is the exactly scientific description of the state of the world before life’s origins, I mean, the state of the real creator of life here. And the explanation about this inspiration is also surprising, but rational: the infant human mind, still not fulfilled with our culture, was being bombarded by flashes of data and scenes registered at our DNA from ours yet non-living ancestrals systems, like the Milk Way – the real creator of biological systems. At my website you can see how the fair tale of the paradise is a metaphor of that “creator” and its internal functionality.

Matrix/DNA: A strong belief in a creation story like that told in the Bible validates the powerful human desire to believe that our lives have meaning and purpose,…

Nope. The creation history of the world in the Bible is pure result of speculation and the history of Adam/Eve in the Paradise is a metaphor and deviation of the real state of the world moments before life’s origins. This state of the world ( the state of this planet, belonging to its stellar system, belonging to a galaxy) drove abiogenesis till the first cell living system, is such way that the building blocks of DNA has the same configuration and functionality of the building blocks of galaxies ( you can see both at “The Universal Matrix for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles Theory”, website.  The first cell system still is a biological copy of this astronomical building block. Then, this astronomical ancestral is registered at our DNA, inside those first 300 genes that has becoming the non-coding DNA. At the infancy of human consciousness, there were flashes, quickly images coming from memory to the mind, related to that ancestral, and those receiving these images wrote the fable of the Paradise, which is the right scientific description of the working astronomical system. But, then, the infant mind operates turning the objects seen into fantasy, imaginary friends for talking, etc. That’s how  and why the authors of the Bible wrote it.

 

xxxxxx

Copia do artigo para analise:

We are hard-wired to want creationism to be true. A strong belief in a creation story like that told in the Bible validates the powerful human desire to believe that our lives have meaning and purpose,…

Matrix/DNA: Nope. The creation history of the world in the Bible is pure result of speculation and the history of Adam/Eve in the Paradise is a metaphor and deviation of the real state of the world moments before life’s origins. This state of the world ( the state of this planet, belonging to its stellar system, belonging to a galaxy) drove abiogenesis till the first cell living system, is such way that the building blocks of DNA has the same configuration and functionality of the building blocks of galaxies ( you can see both at “The Universal Matrix for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles Theory”, website.  The first cell system still is a biological copy of this astronomical building block. Then, this astronomical ancestral is registered at our DNA, inside those first 300 genes that has becoming the non-coding DNA. At the infancy of human consciousness, there were flashes, quickly images coming from memory to the mind, related to that ancestral, and those receiving these images wrote the fable of the Paradise, which is the right scientific description of the working astronomical system. But, then, the infant mind operates turning the objects seen into fantasy, imaginary friends for talking, etc. That’s how  and why the authors of the Bible wrote it. The Matrix/DNA Theory also suggests that our lives have meaning and purpose, but it is very different than the Bible. 

…. that what we do matters and that we are not just “matter grown to consciousness,” in Carl Sagan’s immortal phrase.

The brouhaha about “biblical creation” is really a proxy war about the reality of meaning in the world. Are we here because God intended us to be here? Is our origin part of a plan? Do humans matter in the grand scheme? Are the instincts we have about right and wrong rooted in reality? Or did the universe come about through a mysterious accident called the big bang, followed by other accidents leading to our solar system, our planet and the long meandering history of life that led to us? Are we, as a Dutch documentary once suggested, “A Glorious Accident”?

It would be nice if the scientific story of our origins could be understood as purposeful, rather than as a series of accidents. I laid out just such a “bipartisan” story in my book “Seven Glorious Days,” but the warring camps are just too far apart in this conversation to appreciate any mediation. Evolutionists have fought hard to make sure we understand evolution as lacking direction or purpose. The theory has come to be strongly identified with atheism. Its most public champion is Richard Dawkins, whom Ned Flanders met in hell on a recent episode of “The Simpsons.”

Biblical creationists have fought even harder to keep evolution — the atheists’ creation story — out of Genesis. Its most public champion, Ken Ham, imposes a wooden and implausible literalism on the Bible to ensure that nobody can fit evolution in between the lines.

On Main Street, on television and in the pews of America’s many churches, leaders on both sides portray a choice between a world with purpose and one without. The trouble is, when they ask that either-or question, there’s no right answer.

Morra, Gene Egoísta, Morra! Debate Sobre a Teoria do Gene Egoísta versus Teoria do Genoma Social versus Teoria da Matrix/DNA

sexta-feira, fevereiro 7th, 2014
Baseado no artigo: ” Die, Selfish Gene, Die “

Why it’s time to lay the selfish gene to rest – David Dobbs – Aeon. co

The selfish gene is one of the most successful science metaphors ever invented. Unfortunately it’s wrong
http://aeon.co/magazine/nature-and-cosmos/why-its-time-to-lay-the-selfish-gene-to-rest/

E a oposição materialista respondeu a David Dobbs com o artigo no Pharyngula: 

Higher order thinking

by PZ MYERS

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/12/03/higher-order-thinking/

No artigo do Pharyngula está ocorrendo um debate com nossa participação, sendo meu ultimo comentario o seguinte:

louismorelli

9 February 2014 at 2:26 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment

To: a_ray_in_dilbert_space

You said: Louis, I also take offense at your suggestion that science has failed humans on a moral scale.”

500 millions humans slaves at 400 years ago; 7 billions (90% of the world population?) humans slaves today. Against numbers, there are no minded produced arguments.

I will not remember the evidences that our planet is sick, changing climate, due we are not sure of it is man made illness.

But… accordingly to the results of my investigation, the worst thing that human science is doing is leading Humanity towards the Admirable New World, under the rules of a Big Brother. It will be the premature abortion of this new natural system being generated here, called “consciousness”, for to be eternal zombie.

There are three fundamentals problems with human science in the last 400 years:

1) The supreme, honest, altruistic, goal of the founding fathers at the Illuminism, was denied by the disciples and science sold its soul to the dominant class of human predators, feeding the selfish gene. All science’s production has been delivered gratefully to these predators, giving them power, feeding a monster, becoming anti-human;

2) While the founding fathers were fighting the mysticism and its prejudices to human kind, the disciples built another mystical world view, changing the magical God by the magical blind Universe and science lost the right way. But, like the ancient deist mysticism was based on memory registered at our genetics, this new mysticism is also based on it. It is a genetic process coming from our creator, which is described by Newtonian mechanics, then, science is driven to grasp the mechanical aspect of every natural phenomena, while every phenomena has lots of another kind of matter organization, others invisible natural systems acting here due the hierarchy of systems, etc. That’s why science is driving us, our youngers today, towards a mechanical state of human society;

3) Science must be a feed-back process between the reductionist method and the systemic method. Reductionism gets data about details and systemic approach try to connect these data into big pictures, building good theories that feeds the search for reductionism. But, systemic method does not provides profit in money, nobody is funding it. Systemic thinking was born with Margullis ( the symbiotic theory), Fritjof Capra (The Tao of Physics) and others, till Bertalanffy making what francis bacon did with reductionism, collecting every dispersive data into a General Systems Theory. Bertalanffy could not advance because no human being was discovered yet what is a real natural system, the unique tentative today is my suggestion called “The Universal Matrix/DNA for Natural Systems”. So, The general theory about natural systems was killed and Wiener, Rosenberg, who were mathematicians/physicians took the control and deviate it from natural to artificial systems, creating cybernetics and this whole scientific enterprise today dominated by the electro-mechanical brain of computers.

Nope, my friend. There are 7 billions human beings being tortured today at this absurd human condition of existence, the planet is dying… to the hell with this kind of science! Go back to the intentions of the founding fathers, do what I am doing, alone, paying it with my hard work, not being a traitor.

 

xxxx

Meu primeiro comentario postado no Facebook:

Louis Charles Morelli partilhou uma ligação.

Metamorfose de Homem para Macaco é possível. Basta um comando do cérebro para o DNA mudar os genes dominantes. Eu fazia isso na selva para enganar os macacos e aprender a vida deles… E pela mesma técnica voltava a forma humana. Ate namorei uma orangotanga, a doce Marilyn. Mas de repente o despertador despertou e acordei do sonho…Acontece que fui dormir lendo um artigo  sobre a capacidade de alguns bichinhos se transformarem de repente em outros e voltarem a forma antiga. Gafanhotos se transformam em cigarras e se quiserem, as cigarras voltam a serem gafanhotos! Impressionante! Quem poderia imaginar uma coisa destas?! O que mais a Natureza tem escondido de nos, e vai assim, de choque em choque, revelando aos nossos pobres e combalidos corações?
E o autor do artigo pretende com isso derrubar o ateu guru da juventude moderna, Richard Dawkins. Veja “Die, selfish gene, die” em
http://aeon.co/magazine/nature-and-cosmos/why-its-time-to-lay-the-selfish-gene-to-rest/ . Este artigo gerou um debate acirrado entre feras no primeiro mundo e estou ansioso para ler tudo e depois entrar no meio com a voz alienígena da Matrix/DNA. Ela sempre confirmou a existência do gene egoísta, ela buscou suas origens nas galaxias e tem uma versão muito racional. Mas minha versão é mil vezes mais complexa do que Dawkins pensa. Vamos ver no que isso vai dar…
Gosto ·  · Promover · Partilhar

O gafanhoto

Grasshopper (Acrididae), Barbilla National Park, Costa Rica. Photo by Piotr Naskrecki/Minden Pictures/Corbis    se transforma numa cigarra Shapeshifter; The Locust. Photo by Ocean/Corbis

Preciso aprender urgente esta técnica para transformar notas de 1 dólar  em notas de 100 dólares…

E a seguir meu comentario postado no artigo acima:

  • Avatar
    TheMatrixDNA

    Social genome?! Good, you are arriving next to the world view of Matrix/DNA Theory. But, still far away. It is not a genomic society that drives evolution. It is the system that contains all genomes. Like human societies, its destiny is driven by the ideology that was created by the social system, an ideology executed by the government. This ideology is the system itself, it arises from the sum of informations of all parts plus the new informations generated by internal fuzzy logics that emerges from parts interactions, which generates new informations. So, there is no individual with same ideology as the system.
    Then, all genomes obeys a more deep and invisible commander, from who comes the instructions, rules, etc. This commander is a system, beyond the social genome. Its a phenotype and not genes the driver of biological evolution, this phenotype is the system, but, which system? The universal formula for natural systems and life’s cycles, which is shown at my website, is suggesting which system, and which “ideology” is driven biological evolution at Earth. It is the source of all forces and elements interacting at Earth’s surface, included cosmic radiation with their informations: it is the Milky Way. Its ideology is the tendency to be closed system, the dominance of selfishness. But, biological evolution is not the whole History. And the current theoretical model of galaxies is far away from reality. At our models, every natural system, from atoms to galaxies, have the properties of life and a kind of DNA, wich we call “Matrix”, as must have all ancestrals of biological systems.
    Biological evolution is merely a micro-cycle of a bigger evolution, the cosmological evolution of a unique system that is coming evolving since the Big Bang. Above this galaxy and its “ideology”, there is a powerful agent, at the level of the Universe, with its different ideology ( tendency to be opened system). Then, biological evolution is at the middle of a conflict between two powers, with two different goals. This powerful agent has inserted here its novelty, which we call “consciousness”. Evolutionary biologists need to know the Matrix/DNA formula and knows that there are seven variables acting over evolution here, not only the three variables discovered by Darwin. And we will not have a Theory of Everything if Biologists do not joins with Physics, because the Universe obeys also biological rules. But, we will not understand in full biological evolution if Biologists does not considers the Physics that rules this creator of life here, which is the Milky Way and its thermodynamics variables. At Matrix/DNA Theory we are doing just it.

    We are now discovering that the foundations of Matrix/DNA formula are lightwaves, they have the code for life when any light wave is composed by vibrations running with the same sequence as our bodies runs and change shapes under the process of life’s cycles. Things are far, far more complex than we were thinking…

    XXXXXXX

    Meu comentario em: http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/12/03/higher-order-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-723665

    louismorelli

    8 December 2013 at 11:19 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment

     

    Coming from Amazon jungle I can’t understand the mindset running at Western Sciences, principally, this debate about evolution and biogenesis. Who drives the evolution of my body ( from blastula to adult) is the body of my parents because they are my creator, they are the phenotype driven my genes. Then, logically, who drives the evolution of biological systems at Earth surface must be the creator of this planet, all its elements, included all biological systems. It is the phenotype that created and rules the genes. Its name? The Milky Way. But, then, Western Sciences does not have a model of galaxies that fits as the creator and ancestor and phenotype of the first cell system. That’s the problem. It is merely a job of connecting the seven kinds of astronomical bodies in a working system that you will understanding every step of evolution here. I did it and the face of LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor e creator of life here) is shown in a theoretical model at my website, called “The Universal Matrix/DNA of natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. Ok, I understand that a half-monkey from Amazon jungle can not teach evolutionary biology here, but, maybe I can tell something about natural logics.

    xxxxxx

    1. 74
      ChasCPeterson

      8 December 2013 at 11:31 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment

       

      I can’t understand the mindset running at Western Sciences

      I have a strong suspicion that it’s mutual.

    xxxxxx

    Kagehi

    8 December 2013 at 11:05 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment

     

    Coming from Amazon jungle I can’t understand the mindset running at Western Sciences, principally, this debate about evolution and biogenesis. Who drives the evolution of my body ( from blastula to adult) is the body of my parents because they are my creator, they are the phenotype driven my genes. Then, logically, who drives the evolution of biological systems at Earth surface must be the creator of this planet…

    Congradulations, you just graduated to the sort of thinking that people had 500 years ago in the “Western Mindset” as well. The problem is, some where in the process, people realized that it just didn’t make any damn sense as an explanation. You had to keep making excuses for all the stuff that didn’t work in any sort of way close to what any intelligent creator might have come up with. And, it doesn’t help, at all, to just wave vaguely and proclaim that we just don’t, somehow, understand his genius (which would be 100% completely Western too, as long as you are religious, and looking for excuses for why “god” made things that contradict each other, don’t work rationally, or make no sense as part of a “grand plan”.)

    This is a purely human conceit, the idea that there is some creator some place, that is like us, and therefor, because *we* make things, he “makes things”. I say human conceit because, evolution doesn’t have a plan, but humans can plan. We don’t change with the environment, we change the environment to fit us. Every other animal is subject to the whims of the nature, living or dying, without one bit of say, at all, in when, or how. If the world changes too much for them, they neither adapt, nor can they adapt the world to save themselves. We, mere humans, at least once we learn the “basics” of changing things to fit us, can. The more we know, the more we can change. But, even we have limitations. We get better and better at it. 2,000 years ago, we had no idea how to deal with earthquakes. It was pure luck if building still stood, and a whole island of people was lost, due to them not seeing the signs they needed to leave. Today, we know what it means, and how dangerous it is to stay, even if, in the end, we can’t prevent it from happening. 1,000 years ago, a simple disease could wipe out 90% of the population of a whole continent. Now.. maybe it could still happen, if it really was nasty enough, but it would to be *far* nastier than the ones from back then, for us to have **no** way to deal with it, or contain it, or figure out how it spreads, etc. Even 20 years ago, people would have died from things we can either treat, repair, or control, well enough to keep them alive today.

    We shape our world, and every bloody conceited, hubris filled, fool, since the first day someone made a mud hut, because there wasn’t a cave nearby to live in, has been claiming that there must be some “bigger, invisible, creator, who, like us, made a giant mud hunt, lit fires on it, and thus created the sky!”

    You “insight” isn’t one. Its making unfounded assumptions about what might have “made” the world, based on the totally absurd hubris that there must be something out there, at least a bit, like yourself, who “made” the world. An idea based on the equally silly concept that, without the knowledge, no matter how basic, passed from your parents, and others, to you, about how to do those things, you would have any higher survival rate than any other monkey, if the world suddenly changed too much for you to keep living in it.

    xxxxxxx

    1. 76
      louismorelli

      9 December 2013 at 2:29 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment

      Kagehi, I can bring real natural facts as evidence for debunking every assertion you made in yours post. First of all you have read only the first sentence of my post and fast went answering it, then, you made a big mistake with yours unfounded saying that I am a believer in supernatural creators and a mystical. You can not show to us a document at any library of the world that my world view is a “sort of thinking that people had 500 years ago in the “Western Mindset”. I am based in modern Astronomy, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, which were not known at yesterday. Yes my insight, called “The Universal matrix/DNA of natural Systems and Life’s Cycles” is one, never produced before. You said that because you have no idea what’s my world view. Peterson, i his post above said the right short thing: While I can’t understand the causes that produced yours world view, it is mutual”. We live at different habitats.

      Yours says about “there is some creator some place, that is like us”, or “any intelligent creator might have come up with” or ” why “god” made things”, makes no sense as answer to my post. You are saying that, not me. But when you say “some where in the process, people realized that it just didn’t make any damn sense as an explanation” I can tell you that earlier in my young times, I realized that the gene centric view ( a bunch of atoms organized as chemical molecules) just didn’t make any sense as an explanation. This is mystical, this is no different from the existent religions, wake up man!
      There is no creator since there is no life’s origins, merely a long chain of causes and effects since the Big Bang, which produces the transformation of a unique natural system increasing its complexity, from atoms to galaxies to cell’s systems, to brain systems. If there is some supernatural agent, it is existing before the Big Bang and beyond this Universe, it is not my issue. Let’s go back to real facts here and now.

      You said “evolution doesn’t have a plan, but humans can plan”. I am seeing no human planning of yours social system. I am seeing only that humans are mimicking the rules among animals that I am seeing here in the jungle, the division between few predators and a larger number of preys. Tomorrow in the morning I will wake up and going out I will see infinities directions that I can choose one accordingly to my freedom for choice; you will wake up and be driven to yours local work, you have no choice. What kind of plan is that? A plan against yourself ?!

      Evolution doesn’t have a plan?! What’s the real fact you can bring over the table for proving that? Different from yours gene centric view, I agree that anything material inside this material Universe is the carrier of the evolution process, so, there is no evolution with a plan. Dawkins is the one saying that genes has a plan, previewing the future, when trying to reproduce and spreading themselves. What absurdity! But, as a salvage man living among the salvage Nature, I learned to ask nature for answering my questions about existences. I don’t believe that nature plays dice with her creatures, so, I ask only to her. And about evolution or no evolution, Nature shows to me the evolution process that occurs at my face observing the 9 months of embryogenesis. Anything inside the womb has a plan, anything is able to preview what is coming next, bit there is evolution occurring there. because evolution is not the whole history, it is merely the several micro-steps of a real bigger process: reproduction. So, my Universe is merely a process of genetic reproduction, I don’t know what is being reproduced, it could be yours small atom that triggered the Big Bang, or a natural system too much complex. Reproduction is a plan in itself. And I can bring over the table my real fact as evidence: any pregnant woman. When you see evolution happening here, but believes that evolution have no plan, you are creating a mystical supernatural god called “Absolute Magical Chance”.

      In the jungle I can’t preview earthquakes because I have no scientific tools for pointing them to the right directions. You have the tools but you I can’t do it because you don’t know the right directions. Our difference is about the interpretations of the real known facts about this planet and the system surrounding it. We have a very different theoretical models. Of course, the two are no complete, but, since yours facts are the same of mine, it is an issue about interpretations.

      You said: “You would have any higher survival rate than any other monkey, if the world suddenly changed too much for you to keep living in it.” Do you believe that you and yours western stuff could have any higher survival rate than any other ancient native of Europe, if the world suddenly changed too much?! can you survive long time at the international space station? Have you built any bunker at Mars? Ok. My theoretical astronomical models are suggesting that this planet obeys a process of life cycle, the one that produced the life cycle that acts over yours own body. So, this planet is changing its shape, like yours body changed from blastula to baby. Bacterias existing inside babies can not exists inside blastula and vice-versa. I am waiting the day that you will prove that you are not a bacteria in relation to this planet and the evolving Cosmos. And I am surviving here more than any monkey did, due my knowledge. You can not coming here because you couldn’t survive more than a few weeks, because the the malaria gets you, not me.

      We should debating details about genes, but you went far away from the topic.

      a_ray_in_dilbert_space

      8 February 2014 at 7:54 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment

       

      Louis, I also take offense at your suggestion that science has failed humans on a moral scale. Do you have any idea where we would be if not for antibiotics, if not for antimalarials–hell if not for cell phones. Science has done far more for the poor of the world in its 400 short years than all of the religion or philosophy of the previous 5000 years, and it continues to do more than all the mystics, shamans, politicians, priests and philanthropists combined.

      a_ray_in_dilbert_space

      You said: Louis, I also take offense at your suggestion that science has failed humans on a moral scale.

      500 millions humans slaves at 400 years ago; 7 billions (90% of the world population?) humans slaves today. Against numbers, there are no minded produced arguments. I will not remember the evidences that our planet is sick, changing climate, due we are not sure of it is man made illness. But… accordingly to the results of my investigation, the worst thing that human science is doing is leading Humanity towards the Admirable New World, under the rules of a Big Brother. It will be the premature abortion of this new natural system being generated here, called “consciousness”, for to be eternal zombie.

      There are three fundamentals problems with human science in the last 400 years: 1) The supreme, honest, altruistic, goal of the founding fathers at the Illuminism, was denied by the disciples and science sold its soul to the dominant class of human predators, feeding the selfish gene. All science’s production has been delivered gratefully to these predators, giving them power, feeding a monster, becoming anti-human; 2) While the founding fathers were fighting the mysticism and its prejudices to human kind, the disciples built another mystical world view, changing the magical God by the magical blind Universe and science lost the right way. But, like the ancient deist mysticism was based on memory registered at our genetics, this new mysticism is also based on it. It is a genetic process coming from our creator, which is described by Newtonian mechanics, then, science is driven to grasp the mechanical aspect of every natural phenomena, while every phenomena has lots of another kind of matter organization, others invisible natural systems acting here due the hierarchy of systems, etc. That’s why science is driving us, our youngers today, towards a mechanical state of human society;  3) Science must be a feed-back process between the reductionist method and the systemic method. Reductionism gets data about details and systemic approach try to connect these data into big pictures, building good theories that feeds the search for reductionism. But, systemic method does not provides profit in money, nobody is funding it. Systemic thinking was born with Margullis ( the symbiotic theory), Fritjof Capra (The Tao of Physics) and others, till Bertalanffy making what francis bacon did with reductionism, collecting every dispersive data into a General Systems Theory. Bertalanffy could not advance because no human being was discovered yet what is a real natural system, the unique tentative today is my suggestion called “The Universal Matrix/DNA for Natural Systems”. So, The general theory about natural systems was killed and Wiener, Rosenberg, who were mathematicians/physicians took the control and deviate it from natural to artificial systems, creating cybernetics and this whole scientific enterprise today dominated by the electro-mechanical brain of computers.

      Nope,  my friend. There are 7 billions human beings being tortured today at this absurd human condition of existence, the planet is dying… to the hell with this kind of science! Go back to the intentions of the founding fathers, do what I am doing, alone, paying it with my hard work, not being a traitor.

       

    XXXXXXXX

    Outro artigo no debate: PHARYNGULA

    http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/12/07/the-reification-of-the-gene/

    The reification of the gene

    Posted by PZ Myers on December 7, 2013
    XXXXXXXX
    Debate pelo Twitter – Storify.com

    Talking about genes

    A conversation about David Dobb’s controversial article

    http://storify.com/pzmyers/talking-about-genes

    XXXXXXX

    Mais contribuição de PZ Myers: 

    Higher order thinking

     

A Controvérsia Entre Evolucionistas e Criacionistas na América, Um Segredo por trás do Sucesso da América?

quarta-feira, janeiro 8th, 2014

Just 1/3 of Americans “believe” in the theory of evolution by natural selection 

http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/just-13-americans-believe-theory-evolution-natural-selection

December 31, 2013 | by Lisa Winter

A uniformidade do pensamento gera a esterilidade da criatividade. Enquanto nos países da Europa a grande maioria já abraçou a crença na evolucão segundo a teoria Neo-Darwinista, e na maioria dos outros paises a uniformidade da crença religiosa prevalece, na América a população se encontra dividida quase ao meio (veja resultado da pesquisa no artigo). Para enfrentar os inglêses e seu deus, Darwin, a América meio cientifica/meio religiosa criou o Intelligent Designer, um misto de ciencias e religião. E no artigo, um português, sob o nome de Joaquim, postou um comentario chamando meu país de “dumb” ( quer dizer, um povo mudo, não tem voz própria), que Portugal é diferente no sentido de ser melhor, e especifica sua plena crença no Darwinismo. Todos sabem que aqui na Matrix/DNA temos uma visão de mundo diferente das duas, porem meio-termista, que tanto ratifica algumas coisas no darwinismo quanto no criacionismo. Portanto, vemos como sábia e salutar essa divisão de opiniões quando conhecem apenas as duas teorias, ambas com muitos erros. Abaixo vai a cópia dos comentários:

Joaquim 

Fellow americans that are reading this, first of all sorry for my english, im portuguese by the way, you must understand something and please dont get me wrong on this one you live in a dumb country, im not saying that you guys that are reading this are but i feel that in my country is a lot difrent from there, i feel that in america lots of people go to work have children go out with friends but they really know nothing about the world, they are not very smart in my opinion but for me its really not a shock that only 1/3 of you guys believes in that, we should see that you live in a very religious country where kids are toght that they must do what god pleases in order to have a good life or whatever, they cant think anything by themselves, they only tell you what they were told. well that how i feel about a america at least most of it i know its not 100% like that but… i think you shouldnt be shocked either

Avatar

TheMatrixDNA  to Joaquim 

Well,… Senhor Joaquim, then you think ours is a dumb country and that yours country is different meaning better. I have not seen a long time the name of portugueses in the list of inventions, dominated by 90 of Americans. What is happend?! The uniformity ob believe in yours country has killed creativity, the use of the mind for questioning? If we are dumb why are you using our computers, Internet, and maybe travelling to here by an airplane invented by Americans? Do you know something? I love this division of beliefs in my country, it means our people hear all voices and not one, in this case, the Bretains and their god, Darwin. I don’t believe in jewish and their god, neither in Bretains, I am sure that evolution is a fact, that change over time is a fact, but mixing all theories, I created mine. It is called “The Universal Matrix/DNA of Natural Systems”, I found a link between biological evolution and cosmological evolution which explains universal evolution, a lot more complex than the Darwinian explanation, and filling the gaps of his theory. But the whole thing is suggesting that… the Bible really describes our ancestors at 10 billion years ago, before life;s origins here. My suggestion for you and all Europeans is: does not hear anybody, because nobody knows the thru, search yours own world view. There are problems with Darwin’s theory and only a country that creates things like Intelligent Designer ( which has several mistakes also) will question Darwin and will keep the evolution of knowledge. Senhor Joaquim: tente pensar nas espécies existentes e nos mecanismos sugeridos por Darwin, tente fazer seus calculos. Não vá na onda da Europa que  pensa que alcançaram a Verdade. It is hilarious!

Evolução: Competição não é Fator da Evolução? Mais Um Fato Diminuindo o Darwinismo?

quarta-feira, janeiro 8th, 2014

Species Do Not Need To Evolve Differently To Survive, Study

http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/11950/20140104/evolution-doesnt-force-species-evolve-differently-survive-study.htm

Challenging Darwin’s Origin of Species theory, researchers of a new study found that species living together are not forced to evolve differently in order to survive, according to an Oxford University study.

Meu Comentário postado no artigo:

TheMatrix/DNA:

“Chur-tee’ chur-tee’ chur-tee’ chur-tee’… we are approving Matrix/DNA Theory and not Darwin’s Theory” – says the ovenbird. Every time we try to see deepest in time/space of natural history, we meets problems with the simplest theory formulated by Darwin.  I think that evolution is a universal process that began at the Big Bang, so it is not possible to understand biological evolution without cosmological evolution. Matrix/DNA Theory found that there are four more variables than the three found by Darwin (Variation, Selection, Inheritance) and those four variables Nature applies over all natural systems, be it atoms, galaxies or human bodies. Every time that a species or individual became different due a momentary victory by competition, they were condemned out of the evolutionary three. Cooperation, formation of groups by equals, seems to be the pathway for success of species, producing mutations that are selected for transcendence to new shapes.

XXXXXXXX

Pesquisa:

Ovenbird

Ovenbird

Wikipedia:

The Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla) is a small songbird of the New World warbler family (Parulidae). This migratory bird breeds in eastern North America and winters in Central America, many Caribbean Islands, Florida, and northern Venezuela

Taxonomy

The genus Seiurus is currently treated as monotypic, containing only the Ovenbird; it is genetically distinct from all other species in the family Parulidae, probably the first genus to evolve separately from the rest of the family.[4]

( Ver video com o som do passaro na Wikipedia)  – The main song of the Ovenbird is a series of strident, relatively low-pitched, bisyallabic motives repeated without pause about eight times and increasing in volume. Usually, the second syllable in each motive is sharply accented: “chur-tee’ chur-tee’ chur-tee’ chur-tee’ chur-TEE chur-TEE chur-TEE!” Male Ovenbirds utter a sweet chattering song in the air at twilight, after the manner of the skylark,[12] incorporating portions of the main song into a jumble of sputtering notes and mimicry as they dive back to earth. The call is a variably pitched, sharp “chik!” Some variations recall the common call note of a Downy Woodpecker. If the bird is excited, it may repeat this call several times.[2] The fight call is a high, rising siiii.

 

Evolução: Debate Sobre Seleção Natural

terça-feira, janeiro 7th, 2014

Understanding Evolution: What is Natural Selection?

http://www.fromquarkstoquasars.com/understanding-evolution-what-is-natural-selection/

Posted On December 31, 2013 At 9:00 Am

Meu comentario postado no debate:

Avatar
TheMatrixDNA

The issue about bacteria and penicillin… are you really seeing evolution here? The bacteria is becoming adaptive to an environment where emerged a new element. But, the final result of bacteria’s way of life is causing infections, killing its host, destroying its habitat. When the entire population of bacteria finally gets it, they will be extinct. Pr do you think that they will get to be a new specie, in other environment, to say, elephants? It is not the same case of saying that human specie is evolving when getting resistance to polluters, but is destroying its habitat? Maybe human beings will become a new species at another habitable planet?
Are you not seeing here a larger process, called “degeneration”? Which will be the final result of this history? Isn’t evolution of degeneration of those bacteria?

You said that natural selection is not a force, not a dynamics. You used the word “process”. Since that the genetic mutation of stick insect occurred by error of transcription, there was no purpose in this event. After that, there were more off springs. Still, it is another event by itself, no purpose, and separated from the first event. Then, natural selection is a set of separated movements, Without any physical forces connecting these events. I think it is not a process, either, because process means at least to connected steps.

But how natural selection produces evolution? You said, “survival of the fitter”. But… it is obvious that the fitter grows and dominates. Where are the dinosaurs that dominated the continents? The eagle that dominated the air? The wales that dominated the oceans? The lion that dominated the jungle? What I see them are few ones, going to extinction. So, natural selection is a trap?

Why nature discarded the top of reptile evolution – the dinosaurs – and made U turn, going back to a smaller reptile – the cynodont – for transforming it into a mammal? Discarded the gorilla and went to a smaller hominid for transforming it into a human?

Why natural selection did not work over the reptile when it choose to keep eggs inside instead doing what life did from cells to reptiles, putting eggs out? Why an animal of could blood, a machine for survival, that eats its own eggs and offspring, suddenly fell under love and invented the stupid and painful method of keeping eggs in, getting pregnancy, which turned it easy prey for predators? More difficulties for getting food? Where was natural selection at this time? Sleeping?

My questions is not a critic to the natural process of evolution and natural selection. They are facts, I think. But, I prefer another theory about evolution, called “The Universal matrix/DNA of natural Systems and Life’s Cycle”. Its models explains far better what is evolution and natural selection, but is very more complex than neo-Darwinian theory

Evolução: Teoria acadêmica, como um paradigma que focaliza o imediato e se cega para o conjunto

terça-feira, janeiro 7th, 2014

No livro ” Porque Evolução é Fato Verdadeiro”, Dr. Coyne usou este exemplo no capitulo intitulado ” A Engenharia da Evolução”:

“Quando ela foi introduzida na década de 1940, a penicilina foi uma droga miraculosa, especialmente efetiva na cura de infecções causadas pela bactéria Staphylococcus aureus. Em 1941, a droga pôde dizimar cada bactéria do mundo. Agora, setenta anos mais tarde, mais de 95% desta bactéria são resistentes a penicilina”.

Mas… mas… digo eu: “Onde o Dr. Coyne está vendo evolução nesse caso? Uma bactéria que está cavando seu próprio tumulo, ao se desenvolver na arte de matar seu hospedeiro?! Você acha mesmo que a espécie humana está evoluindo ao aprender a resistir a poluição e continuar a destruindo seu habitat?

Algo está errado nisso. Estou vendo aqui uma evolução de um processo maior, degenerativo. Este processo está atuando com tanta fôrça sobre a bactéria que está se retroalimentando de mais capacidade para aniquilar os 100% delas. E acho que o Dr. Coyne está com sério problema de perspectiva. Produzido pela sua formação no método reducionista. Ele se focaliza em observar o que acontece com as bactérias, aqui e agora, se esquecendo de ver o corpo humano onde as bactérias estão, e esquecendo-se de ver o resultado final desta história.

Eu teria mais uma pergunta: “Certamente o agente por trás da seleção natural aqui não é o meio-ambiente, o corpo humano. Quem será, então?

Pela ótica do Dr. Coyne, o agente da seleção natural está dentro da bactéria.

 

Evolução versus religião na América perturbando escolares, e a Mediação pela Matrix/DNA Theory

sábado, janeiro 4th, 2014

Este assunto na América está ficando muito sério e perigoso, pois veja neste artigo como ele está atormentando dia a dia a vida de professores, estudantes, reitores, políticos, etc. Está até derrubando grandes colégios, quando os financiadores descontentes com o ensino da Evolução retiram seu patrocínio.

Mas o conflito não deveria existir se ambos os lados tivessem um pouco mais de conhecimento sôbre a real Natureza e os profundos significados ocultos em suas criações, ou seja, se soubessem o que a Teoria da Matrix/DNA tem descoberto e reunindo mais evidencias para seus modelos que as duas outras partes juntas.

Tentarei traduzir aqui um inteiro artigo publicado por quem realmente sabe o que está se passando, pois trata-se de um professor que está sendo perseguido num destes colégios, ao mesmo tempo que vou copiando aqui os meus comentários postados no debate que se segue ao artigo.

2013 Was a Terrible Year for Evolution

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/02/2013-was-a-terrible-year-for-evolution.html

Karl W. Giberson

By Karl W. Giberson – 2014/01/02/

Meu comentário postado no artigo do The Daily Beast 

MatrixDNA –  

 The problem is not the real natural process of evolution and real facts of origins hidden under the Bible’s scripture. It is all about human interpretations, as discovered now by a new and different interpretation of those real facts, called Matrix/DNA Theory. The facts that Science and the Bible deal with are the same, the interpretations of evolutionists are 50% right and 50% wrong, while the interpretations of Christians are just 50% right where evolutionists are 50% wrong, and vice-versa. Evolution of biological systems is a fact, the problem is the neo-Darwinian theory, pointing out wrong interpretations of real mechanisms and non-complete, since that the three variables VSI – Variation, Selection, Inheritance – are merely half history because the variable are seven, not three. The problem is that Darwin and reductionism has separated Cosmological Evolution and Biological evolution into two blocks without any link between then, and it is a big mistake. Then, the four variable acting here over evolution are not seen, producing gaps and denying the effort of explanations, which are opportunistically used by creationists.

 Genesis, Adam and Even in the Paradise, were not revealed by supernatural beings, it was the memory of ancient people remembering by flashes the history of our ancestors comprising 13,7 billion years, history registered at the memory of our DNA at the center of neurons.  But those flashes were wrong interpreted, the Paradise is the right description of ancestors at the state of thermodynamic system under equilibrium by metaphors.

See a little bit of Matrix/DNA interpretation and discover how it is just the factor that is missing for keeping faith and Science, everybody will be happy.

Tradução:

MatrixDNA –  

O problema não é o real natural processo da Evolução e os reais fatos das origens ocultos sob a escritura da Bíblia. É a respeito das interpretações humanas, tal como foi descoberto agora por uma nova e diferente interpretação daqueles fatos reais, denominada Teoria da Matrix/DNA. Os fatos que a a Ciência e a Bíblia estão abordando são os mesmos, as interpretações dos evolucionistas estão 50% corretas e 50% erradas, enquanto as interpretações dos cristãos são justamente 50% corretas onde evolucionistas são 50% errados, e vice-versa.  A evolução dos sistemas biológicos são um fato, o problema é a teoria neo-darwinista, afirmando errôneas interpretações de real mecanismos naturais, e incompleta, desde que as três variáveis VSI- Variação, Seleção, Hereditariedade – são meramente a metade da história, porque as variáveis são em numero de sete e não três. O problema é que Darwin e o reducionismo têm separado Evolução Cosmológica e Evolução Biológica em dois blocos sem nenhum elo entre eles, e isso é um grande equivoco. Então, as quatro variáveis atuando aqui sobre a evolução não estão sendo vistas, produzindo falhas na teoria da evolução e anulando os esforços de explicações, o que são oportunisticamente usados pelos criacionistas.

Gênese, Adão e Eva no Paraíso, não foram revelados por seres supernaturais, foi apenas a memória do povo antigo se lembrando através de visões relâmpagos e intuições, a história de nossos ancestrais compreendida em 13,7 bilhões de anos, história registrada na memória do nosso DNA, que estão no centro dos neurônios. Mas aquelas visões foram equivocadamente interpretadas, o Paraíso é a correta descrição dos ancestrais no estado de sistemas sob equilíbrio termodinâmico, por metáforas.

Veja um pouco da interpretação da Matrix/DNA e descubra como ela é justamente o fator que está faltando para manter fé e Ciência, e todos serão felizes.

Comentario:

Saltinecracker –  

If God is so great and so perfect then why are their birth defects.So God couldn’t create a being that can’t give birth to something that doesn’t have defects. That doesn’t sound so smart to me nor  God like.

Reply da Matrix/DNA:

MatrixDNA –  

@Saltinecracker  –  That’s an easy answer by creationism. The Creator is responsible by His creation, not for the wrong practice of free will making new wrong creations. And easy answer for Matrix/DNA Theory: our ancestors, about four billions years ago, yet under the primitive evolutionary shape of an astronomical system, choose to be a closed selfish system, cutting relations with external world, closing the doors to Evolution. The Universe reacted applying the force of entropy, the system decayed here, initially under a chaotic state, creating this salvage biosphere in state of chaos, and we, humans, inherited that mistake in shape of selfish genes. So, birth defects are still happening.

Comentario:

GarthMaul – 
If evolution is real, why is it nowhere observed to occur in nature? If science cannot prove that it occurs, why should anyone accept it? Seems to me it is more reasonable to believe in an invisible intelligent creator, than an invisible unintelligent who-knows-what.

Reply da Matrix/DNA:

@GarthMaul  There is a third alternative, you are missing it: an invisible intelligent creator, but, not supernatural. Be it “who-knows-what”, something triggered the Big Bang. Why not a natural intelligent system merely doing the same thing that triggered the Big Bang of an envelope spermatozoon inside an ovule at the initial moment of yours own body? Evolution is proved by 9 months of embryogenesis, when an initial ball of cells evolves into a being. We can’t see Cosmological Evolution due the relativistic effect: the point in time/space that we are as observers is microscopic, while only a macroscopic observer can see evolution as we see it at embryogenesis. So, if you want calling the mysterious system existing before this Universe as God, feel free, no problem for us, agnostics and evolutionists.

Steve50 –  

I thought maybe this article would have some evidence….nope!!! All about being offended that we don’t buy this stuff. We are not like animals. We create. The gulf in between attests to creation. Their is no in between.

Reply da MatrixDNA

MatrixDNA – 

@steve50  Yous said: “The gulf in between attests to creation. There is no in between”

Nope. There are no gulf in betweens. It happens that in Nature there is something called “hierarchy of systems”. If you does not know genetics, you should believe in evolutionary gaps between the shape of a fetus and the shape of an embryo when watching a static movie of embryology. Who works the informations that transforms fetus into embryos is the DNA, a hidden system. Same way has worked biological evolution here, from bacteria to monkeys. It happens that you does not know the real source for biological systems. At Matrix/DNA models we have found that astronomical galactic systems has as building blocks a working primitive system that has all life’s properties. So, the Milk Way is the real LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor) which Darwin thought that was microscopic and living at earth surface. Every gulf in between at Darwinian theory is now fulfilled by informations supplied by that hidden hierarchic system. I agree that nature is surprising us every day at each discovery, I agree that nature is a job of supreme intelligence, but… my body seems a job of intelligence also and I know that my parents – even that they are intelligent – did not applied any intelligence and no magics for doing me. Why not God?

EABlair –  

I find more dignity and wonder in the notion that I am related, however distantly, to every other living thing on the planet than in believing that my ultimate ancestor started out as a pile of dirt breathed on by an invisible spirit.

Reply by MatrixDNA – 

@EABlair But…the first living being on the planet, from which evolved every living being, with exception of human species, was made by an invisible spirit that breathed a pile of dirt or initial soup. Natural systems are like computers, composed by hardware and software. We created computers merely copying what exists in Nature. I know it because the bits-information that penetrated terrestrial atoms at that soup, were photons radiated by galactic decay, and they drove the atoms to make new combinations, reproducing here the building blocks of galaxies in its biological fashion, as cell’s systems. The anatomy and functionality of those astronomical building blocks are the same we see at a base-pair of nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA. So, there is a photonic counterpart of every natural system, you can call it “software”, or “invisible spirit”, no problem, you are always right. Human species has a novelty, called consciousness, which is the same software of atoms and galaxies. It happens that the “spirit”, or the software, came with the Big Bang, was sleeping at atoms, dreaming at galaxies, began waken up at animals, and lifted up at human beings. You are the one that breathed on that soup.

Something else: we are discovering that the seven principals shapes of any human body under a life’s cycle, vibrating at specific frequencies, the same sequence that vibrates the seven frequencies of any natural light wave. So, natural light is the source that imprints the vital cycle over inertial mass, like dark matter. In other words, light is the first source of a code for life. The Bible says that first God created the light. It seems thru for me now, since that natural light seems to be the arms and hands used by God for creation, everything by natural genetic process. And remember that light is composed by photons, or vice-versa.

somervillechangeling – 

Quote: “Hey, did you know that Adam and Eve were not the first humans and never even existed? And that you can still be a Christian and believe that?”

I have no problems with Adam and Eve not being the first physical humans, but they were the first spiritual humans made in God’s image…

Reply by MatrixDNA –  

@somervillechangeling  Adam and Eve were not the first humans, they were not humans, but, they existed as ancestors of all living beings. The fable of Eden Paradise was written by primitive ancient people with brains not occupied by this accumulated culture in the last 4 thousands years. Their brains were almost empty, so, at their dreams, the neurons produced flashes of scenes and events registered at their DNA’s memory. It happens that DNA is 3,5 billion years old, but its history did not began here. DNA is merely the biological shape of a universal Matrix, a kind of DNA of our ancestors systems, like atoms and galaxies. So, the MatrixDNA  is at least, 13,7 years old, and its whole life’s history is registered at our DNA, most of them, registered at those 300 genes that emerged with the first living being, and today is the most part of “junk DNA”. The description of Eden Paradise by biblical authors is a metaphor for describing the building blocks of galaxies, which were our ancestors, which is registered at our DNA . If you describes a closed perfect natural system under thermodynamic equilibrium, yours description with “scientific words” will describes the same images of an Eden Paradise. I have the system designed here and I can see here every symbol used in Bible: the serpent, the tree, the apple, a paradisiac system, and the system has a circuit  composed by two flows of informations. it happens that those two energetic flows works exactly as works the spermatozoon and ovule at sexual organisms. What the problem if the biblical writers – who never saw a spermatozoon and ovule – choose a name for them, like Adam and Eve? Really they were our female and male ancestors, but, hey, when the top of evolution was the galactic shape. The fable of the Paradise in Genesis was not revealed by supernatural beings, neither by God: it was merely sweet memories from the past when our ancestors where like Gods… without consciousness…  Even the entropic decay of that system could be described as The Fall of Adam and Even, and the beginning here as “the sons of necessity” because here they lifted up as opened systems.  C.S. Lews was pretty right !

somervillechangeling – 
@Saltinecracker  –

I’m inclined to doubt evolution just as much as I doubt intelligent design. Both sides cherry pick arguments and have axioms that I’m not sure will hold up as viable in the next civilization that replaces ours as ours did the medieval.

Reply by 

MatrixDNA – 

@somervillechangeling @Saltinecracker  – Intelligent Designer has some good points, like the irreducible reversibility to a LUCA existing at Earth. Life at earth is product of a design, the source of this design never existed at Earth, but that source was not an intelligent being. Like the genome of yours parents that designed yours body was not intelligent being. LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor) of all living beings is the building blocks of galaxies, and its picture is at my website. Every detail of any living body of any species are reducible to LUCA, but LUCA leaves in the sky. I don’t know and don’t have yet the picture of the system that triggered the Big Bang. The MatrixDNA theoretical models are suggesting that that system must be a conscious intelligent system, since that we are seeing consciousness being reproduced here. But the models suggests that inside this Universe is occurring a process of genetic reproduction, reproduction of that ex-machine system. if you want call it God, no problem with that. I know that the origins of life here did not require intelligence.

 XXXXXXX

Obs: Meu nickname no Daily é MatrixDNA

XXXXXXX

Tradução do Artigo no The Daily Beast

2013 Foi um Terrível Ano para Evolução

Nunca duvide da crescente evidencia – 64 por cento dos Protestantes Evangélicos e brancos rejeitam a ciência, e professores dos Colégios cristãos são atacados se a noticia de que estão ensinando evolução se espalha para alem da escola.

Evolução não trabalhou bem em 2013. O ano terminou com o livro ante-evolucionista “A Duvida de Darwin” como best seller na categoria de paleontologia da Amazon. O estado do Texas consumiu uma boa parte do ano tentando manter o mais respeitado texto da Biologia para o médio ensino fora das escolas publicas. E o líder ante-evolucionista e administrador do Creation Museum, Ken Ham, fêz seu discurso anual dizendo que “o prego final tinha sido posto no tumulo da pobre e cambaleante teoria da evolução do Darwin.

( continuar esta tradução quando o tempo permitir)

Evolution did not fare well in 2013. The year ended with the anti-evolution bookDarwin’s Doubt as Amazon’s top seller in the “Paleontology” category. The state of Texas spent much of the year trying to keep the country’s most respected high school biology text out of its public schools. And leading anti-evolutionist and Creation Museum curator Ken Ham made his annual announcement that the “final nail” had been pounded into the coffin of poor Darwin’s beleaguered theory of evolution

 

 

98% da Humanidade é Lixo, Descartável, pelo Pensamento Elitista, Baseando-se no DNA. Veja Porque…

quarta-feira, janeiro 1st, 2014
DNA Lixo ou Junk DNA

DNA Lixo ou Junk DNA

Basta-se ler o memorandum da estratégia dos multinacionais maiores grupos financeiros da atualidade, e ler Os Protocolos dos Sábios de Sião de século atrás, para se ter a certeza que a mentalidade dos mentores destes documentos foi formada pela face negra da teoria da evolução darwinista e as  modernas interpretações acadêmicas dos ultimos fatos descobertos pela genética. Confunde-se a cosmovisão da religião ocidental onde os selecionados por Deus herdarão a Terra com a cosmovisão Darwinista da seleção natural dos mais fortes, espertos e capazes, assim se auto-justificam os meios aplicados pelos discípulos destes mentores, mesmo que sejam moralmente anti-humanos, e posiciona-se a alma confortavelmente do lado de Deus. Mas, assim como os dinossauros que reinaram nos continentes, as baleias que reinaram nos mares, as águias que reinaram nos ares, os leões que reinaram nas selvas, ou se extinguiram ou estão em vias de extinção, porque se enganaram e escolheram caminhos errados em relação aos desígnios da Natureza que os descartou, assim estão errados os que reinam sobre os humanos hoje, e da mesma forma serão descartados se não mudarem essa mentalidade a tempo. E vou mostrar porque.

Para quem não está informado, façamos um breve retrospecto sobre o que foi denominado “DNA-lixo”.

DNA não-codificante (Wikipedia –

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_n%C3%A3o-codificante )

Em genéticaDNA não codificante descreve o DNA que não contém instruções para fazer proteínas (ou outros produtos celulares tais como o RNA não-codificante).  Algum do DNA não-codificante está envolvido na regulação da atividade das regiões codificantes. No entanto, muito deste DNA não tem função e por vezez é referido como “junk DNA“. (….) Mais de 98% do genoma humano não codifica proteínas, incluindo os introns e o material da região intergênica. ( Para quem quiser realmente se informar, veja a pagina em inglês que tem muito mais informações, ou então, pesquisa no Google).

Mas na mentalidade maioria dos “ricos”, o que acontece a nivel de um individuo e seu DNA, é imaginariamente projetado como acontecendo a nivel coletivo e no DNA desse coletivo, denominado “Humanidade”.  No memorandum destes grupos que compõem a “mão invisível que controla a macro-economia”,  entre os quais alguns  manipulam cerca de 600 bilhões de dólares, portanto mais que tôda a quantia produzida anualmente pelo Brasil inteiro, o que conta e tem valor na sua estratégia para 2014 é o dinheiro que circula entre a pequena porcentagem dos que podem comprar Lamborghines e mansões de milhões de dólares, pois isso é que dá os lucros que lhes interessam. O resto… é tão pouco que não vale a pena. Portanto eu pessoalmente estou incluído neste resto, sou lixo humano, não faço a menor diferença se existir ou não existir. Na cabeça deles, não na minha cabeça e nas minhas atitudes.

Minha quase analfabeta querida avó já dizia que “quem procura, acha”.  Isto explica a linhagem de fatos reais que foram descobertos pelas Ciências da Natureza (biologia, química, física, etc.) orientadas pela linguagem preferida por estas Ciências para produzir suas teorias, a Matemática, no ultimo século. Tudo começou com alguns traidores dos  pais fundadores do  “Iluminismo” – os quais  que sonharam com cientistas livres trabalhando na busca de conhecimentos para a melhoria das condições humanas – e mudaram tudo patenteando uma linha de pensamento “mecanista”, “positivista”, “pragmática”, e “niilista”, que orientou onde e o que as Ciências devia observar e procurar, e assim encontram em cada objeto observado apenas as características que procuram. Freud invadiu os porões do inconsciente humano para lá encontrar a besta fera e se cegar totalmente para o anjo cósmico ali adormecido; a genética invadiu a intimidade do DNA buscando a física estrutural, encontrou-a em apenas 2% do DNA, nada viu dos outros 98%,  e imediatamente declarou estes como “lixo”.

Mas quando um plano de busca é muito débil que se impõe limites a níveis minúsculos, logo esta pesquisa atinge estes limites, porem, a evolução natural não tem limites na Terra e para o DNA, e assim continuam a se encontrar  “por acidente”, o que não se previu e o que não se queria encontrar. Algumas recentes descobertas estão levando muitos cientistas a “verem” uma fantastica base de dados e atividades no meio do presumido lixo, a ponto mesmo de dizer que se não se iniciar por um sinal produzido no meio do lixo, não existe atividade e sobrevivência dos 2%. Acho que jé era óbvio que se a grande massa de humanos compondo os 98% não arregaçarem as mangas e porem a mão na massa, iniciando a produção de qualquer bem material, a cúpula que está nos 2% ficou tão afeminada e aveludada, que não sobreviveria em poucos dias. Mas não se enxerga o que não nos convêm, o que não nos interessa procurar. Como eu e meus dois amigos brancos vindos da civilização e entrando na selva pela primeira vez, estávamos tão aveludados que em 7 ou 8 dias caímos os 3 sob o fogo da malaria, enquanto o índio-guia se mantinha em pé, inatingível, e com a fôrça para nos arrastar fora da selva. Ou como quando tentei de toda maneira imitar os 60.000 homens em Serra Pelada, botando um saco com 50 quilos de pedra e lama nas costas para escalar subindo os 80 metros da encosta íngreme, mas escorregava caindo para o fundo da mina. A vida sedentária de escritório na capital, e mesmo a academia modeladora de corpos artificiais, me tornou mortalmente dependente da atividade da massa que continuou vivendo a sua Natureza.

Portanto devemos fazer uma busca no que esse grupo divergente está encontrando no DNA lixo. É óbvio que também estão encontrando apenas o que sua prévia preferida visão de mundo os limita a encontrar, uma visão evidente quando se observa que estão sendo publicados na mídia com tendencia mistica religiosa. Uma rápida busca no Google desfila milhares de títulos mencionando coisas como “O Mito do DNA-Lixo”, etc. Vejamos apenas um trecho:

Discover Magazine

ENCODE: the rough guide to the human genome

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/09/05/encode-the-rough-guide-to-the-human-genome/#.UsSTF_RDvSg

O projeto internacional gigante denominado ENCODE – a Enciclopédia dos Elementos do DNA – tem nos movido da pesquisa “Aqui está o mapa do genoma” para “Aqui está o que o genoma faz”. Nos ultimos 10 anos, uma equipe internacional de 442 cientistas tem descrito 147 tipos de células em 24 tipos de experiencias. Sua meta: catalogar cada letra ( nucleotideo) dentro do genoma que faz alguma coisa. Por anos nós temos sabido que apenas 1,5% do genoma realmente contem instruções para fazerem proteinas, os cavalos de fôrça moleculares das nossas células. . Mas o ENCODE tem revelado que o resto do genoma – a não-codificante maioria – está plena de elementos funcionais. Isto é, estão fazendo alguma coisa. Eles contem fundamentais campos onde proteinas podem expressar e ligar ou desligar genes. Ou eles são lidos e transcritos em moléculas de RNA. Ou eles controlam se genes vizinhos são transcritos( os promoters). Ou eles influenciam as atividades de outros genes, às vezes em grandes distancias ( os enhancers). Ou eles afetam como o DNA é modelado e empacotado. Enfim, de acordo com o que agora se está descobrindo ( acidentalmente, pois nunca antes se pensou que isso seria encontrado) com a analise do ENCODE, 80 por cento do DNA tem função bioquimica.

Na minha mente vem imediatamente um pensamento: ” Então, assim como aquela minoria dos répteis que se chamava dinossauro, reinava no continente e foi descartada, sendo a evolução continuada pelos pequenos lagartos; aquela minoria das aves que se chamava “águia” ou “gavião-real” que reinava nos ares foi descartada, mas os passarinhos continuam aí pululando nas arvores do meu quintal e atrevidos me sujando na cabeça; que aquela minoria de grandes felinos que reinavam nas selvas foram descartados enquanto os pequenos esquilos passam debaixo das pernas do velhinho sentado no banco do bosque em frente de casa; assim é possível que os 2% de genes superiores hoje no DNA sejam descartados mas os 98% continuem a sua eterna senda evolucionaria, assim é possivel que os 2% da minoria da espécie humana hoje que se julga não-lixo seja descartada, se não acordarem a tempo. Claro! Óbvio!  O Universo não se ajoelha aos gostos dos humanos, ele não está nem aí para o que pensamos, a Natureza não cede responsabilidades, ela continua no comando. Toda a nossa tecnologia somada foi copiada de apenas uma pequena porcentagem da tecnologia que a natureza ainda esconde sob as mangas, não se iludam com a capacidade de controlar o mundo. Mas seria ingenuidade acreditar que agora os tais grupos financeiros vão correndo a mudar seus memoranduns e estratégias para 2014. Vão espernear dizendo que o ENCODE está mentindo, assim como esperneiam aqueles que tem muito dinheiro investido em industrias poluidoras contra as evidencias das mudanças climáticas produzidas pela nação humana.

A 30 anos atrás, na selva, encontrei uma diferente visão de mundo que sugeriu que não existe DNA lixo. Os modelos e fórmulas sussurrados pela Natureza virgem e selvagem sugeriam que naqueles trezentos e tais genes surgidos no primeiro ser vivo aqui na terra estavam registrados os 13,7 bilhões de anos da História Natural Universal. Sugeriam que o EDNA nada mais é que a face biológica de uma fórmula universal a qual denominei Matrix/DNA que surgiu fragmentada em bilhões de bits-informação no Big Bang, estivera por trás da formação dos átomos, das galaxias e dos seres vivos. Sugeriam que assim como os usos e costumes de uma tribo primitiva do Amazonas pode evoluir a ponto de se tornar uma moderna Constituição de um pais, assim evoluiu a nivel universal aquela fórmula a ponto de se tornar essa magistral carta constitucional dos corpos vivos que é o DNA. E se aqueles genes atuaram na nebulosa de atomos, atuaram na nebulosa de galaxias, eles contem a infra-estrutura da arquitetura magistral que é o corpo humano. retire a estrutura, o alicerce, e a arquitetura inteira se colapsa ruindo a seus pés. Mas,… a 30 anos atrás isso era apenas uma idéia esquisita na cabeça de um semi-macaco da selva, nada que justificasse sua consideração na estratégia dos homens superiores da capital.

A cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA está sugerindo agora como e porque a dita “elite” economica dentre a Humanidade está indo contra os desígnios das fôrças naturais reinantes aqui na superficie do planeta Terra. Ninguem pode negar que a ultima mais complexa evoluída arquitetura que a natureza está investindo pesado é o cérebro humano. A Matrix/DNA está sugerindo que os 7 bilhões de cérebros humanos são, cada um, uma fração da totalidade de um pecado capital, original, que caiu desta galaxia para se auto-curar. A Natureza quer sistemas abertos à evolução e não sistemas fechados em si mesmos, conservadores, como foram as galaxias nossas ancestrais. A idéia aqui é colocar cada fração de um pecado a interagir com os outros 99% de si mesmo como pecado que está na cabeça de todo o resto dos outros, agitando, conflitando, sendo vitima, sentindo na pele os efeitos de si mesmo como pecado, para no fim, apenas pelo seu livre-arbítrio entender e ser divinamente contra o pecado que se foi um dia. Assim cada ser humano é como um gene, carregando um pequeníssimo detalhe que o diferencia dos outros 6 bilhões e novecentos e noventa e nove milhões de humanos, uma mensagem especifica, distinta, uma informação unica, pessoal, intransferível e indestrutível.

Mas não se vê apenas o cérebro como ultimo ápice da evolução aqui e agora. No cérebro e pelo cérebro está nascendo algo que se chama “auto-consciência” Um embrião ainda que surgiu apenas ha alguns minutos do tempo cósmico. Então se deduz que o sentido da existência de humanos auto-conscientes  como genes é gerar seu próprio corpo do futuro, um ser de pura auto-consciência, onde o resto, a matéria, é descartada como a placenta.

A evolução do cérebro se encaminha para dotar o cérebro de mais sensores do que os cinco aturais, inclusive para captar as outras 7 ou 8 dimensões previstas na ultima moderna teoria cosmológica, a String Theory. mas para que essa evolução de cérebros caminhe a contento, primeiro é preciso que a natureza revele sua carta-magna e seu especifico código moral como norte para humanos seguirem. Segundo e não menos importante requisito é que se deixe estes cérebros formatados por este código moral, livres para empregarem seu tempo na aprendizagem dos fenomenos naturais pelo método cientifico, sem prévios julgamentos e planos do que se deve procurar. E ao jogar 98 % dos humanos no trabalho escravo forçado está-se entorpecendo, imobilizando, estes cérebros que precisam evoluir. Ao se ignorar a automação que deveria substituir o humano no trabalho braçal rotineiro porque é mais lucrativo e menos perigoso para o regime manter essa grande massa como mão de obra barata, está se desafiando a natureza em seus objetivos. Ao se manter catequizando as mentes ingenuas e inocentes dos jovens nos bancos escolares com o código moral que emana de uma visão de mundo baseada numa teoria capenga e incompleta como  o neo-darwinismo, afasta-se os humanos de se introduzirem na aprendizagem da grande macro-evolução universal como fizemos com a Matrix/DNA, mas esta ampliação dos horizontes humanos é condição sine qua nom para o desenvolvimento de uma auto-consciência que começa no pequenino humano para se tornar a auto-consciência da existência do próprio Universo.

Estão no caminho errado. São 2% de genes transcendentais contendo valiosas informações, sem as quais o nosso ser futuro nasceria aleijado. Temos que recupera-los antes que mais um cineasta no futuro faça uma versão do Jurassic Park tendo os ricos de hoje no papel dos extintos dinossauros. Eu estou a mostrar que não sou não-codificante como lixo descartável. Estou em plena atividade. Por exemplo, antes de fazer qualquer negócio com um grupo qualquer, antes de aceitar um cheque de um banco privado, quero ver o seu memorandum, a sua estratégia para 2014. Não compro lamborghines nem mansões de milhões de dólares mas produzo alguns produtos e os destino a quem tenho aprovado estratégias. Sou como um interruptor que pode ligar ou desligar ricos, assim como os promoters e os enhancers que uma vez iludiram os pesquisadores desta “Ciência”.